Clifton Hill Brewpub
from Australia (VIC)
Highest RatedThe Dark Hill (68 / 100) Average score62 / 100 (Decent)
Lowest RatedThat's Nuts (57 / 100) Number Tried4
That's Nuts
Reviewed by LaitueGonflable on 20.07.17 on tap
57 / 100
Pistachio gose, brewed for GABS 2017 and tried there on tap.

Pours a very, very pale colour, practically colourless really, but also very cloudy so it's just this nearly-white glob in the glass. Bit of a rim of head, but really not much. Looks curious.

Smells fairly nutty. Buttery malt, with a salty sour and underripe green apple character as well. Not bad but I'm getting some nice characters, and some gose characters, and wondering why make this a gose?

Taste is sweet upfront, with caramel-vanilla notes. Develops a nice nutty character early mid and then the finish just turns tragically gosey. Salty, sour, and just eradicates all the nice characters in a terrible way. Yeah this is exactly why I don't like goses.

Decent texture, but a bit too bitty from the unfilteredness.

Not that great; salty and weird. It's a decent premise but guys look, just because gose is the hot 'weird' style at the moment (or was, I really don't think it even is, any more) doesn't mean you have to ruin a good idea by adding salt and lowering the ABV. I just think this tastes of wasted potential pistachios.
appearance: 3.5 | aroma: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | drinkability: 3.25
India Weizen
Reviewed by LaitueGonflable on 20.07.16 on tap
67 / 100
On tap at GABS 2016.

Pours a champagne colour, fairly cloudy to the point of being sedimenty. White head, foamy with just a thin crown retaining. But OK.

Smells tangy, mostly. Passionfruit, with some pine wood characters, touch of spice and a hint of bitterness. Earthy, fruity. Not bad at all.

Taste is similar. Some spice notes leading from the early grainy malt character into a fruity mid, with passionfruit abounding. Finish is really very bitter, and very phenolic to a fault. Bit too earthy, not quite medicinal but just oddly astringent. Maybe too much spice, as well.

Decent body, hint of boozey warmth which is not bad.

Not bad, but the weizen yeast notes kind of detract from the fruity melange that is created from the malt/hops balance. They could have created a decent wheat-infused pale ale with a nice hoppy character but the two kind of clash when combined.
appearance: 3.5 | aroma: 4.0 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | drinkability: 3.5
The Dark Hill
Reviewed by Jez on 12.07.15 on tap
58 / 100
Tried on-tap at GABS 2015 in Melbourne.

Pours a deep, Vegemite-coloured brown with some solid hazing to it. Body has a bit of heft to it and holds very fine carbonation. Head is beige-to-tan in colour, and is fairly firm, full and thick, leaving solid sheets of lace. Looks good all up.

Nose has some coffee notes, but it's bright and thin where it should be mild and smooth. There's almost a touch of acid through the thinness here, perhaps with some faint sweetness or barrel character. Hmm.

Smooth entry on the palate at least with a touch of toastiness. There's something like slightly astringent berry on the mid-palate, and a weird suggestion of chilli spice towards the back. Aftertaste has a bit of a prickle like this as well.

Feel is genuinely quite wrong: it's overcarbed, and very light, where it should be smooth, soft and rich.

OK: first up, I don't get how a mild ale should ever hit 6% ABV. But worse is the fact that the 6% doesn't do anything to help this beer at all. It doesn't add smoothness or richness, and if anything, this feels thinner and weaker than it should do normally. So in many ways I'm quite unimpressed.
appearance: 4.0 | aroma: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | drinkability: 3.25
The Dark Hill
Reviewed by LaitueGonflable on 11.06.15 on tap
68 / 100
Hmmm, so they call this a dark mild ale but I'm not sure 6% really fits in with that... anyway...

Looks awesome in the cup. Brown colour, fair amount of cloud. Head is beige, creamy and thick and leaving some amazing lacing around the edges. Wonderful.

Smells nice and oaky as per the description. Bourbon character with coconut and plenty of chocolate malt as well. Touch of licorice spice on there as well. Nice sweet oaky notes; pleasant.

Taste is a bit too mild, after what the nose promised. Less oak character but still leaning towards bourbon notes. Chocolate malt is light and insubstantial. This is sort of what I expected from the description, but then the nose got my hopes up and I thought maybe it could be a light-bodied drop but with loads of complexity as well. Not to be.

Decent body, texture feels pretty nice as it goes down, not too heavy.

Definitely a decent mild ale, but it could have emphasised the oak on the palate more and let it sort of muscle through the beer. Still, nice.
appearance: 4.75 | aroma: 4.0 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | drinkability: 3.75